This book documents the evolving path of U.S. agriculture in the 20th Century and the role of public R & D in that evolution. The work begins with a detailed quantitative assessment of the shifting patterns of production among the states and over time and of the public institutions and investments in agricultural R & D. Then, based on newly constructed sets of panel data, some of which span the entire 20th Century and more, the authors present new econometric evidence linking state-specific agricultural productivity measures to federal and state government investments in agricultural research and extension. The results show that the time lags between R & D spending and its effects on productivity are longer than commonly found or assumed in the prior published work. Also, the spillover effects of R & D among states are important, such that the national net benefits from a state's agricultural research investments are much greater than own-state net benefits. The main findings are consistent across a wide range of reasonable model specifications. In sum, the benefits from past public investments in agricultural research have been worth many times more than the costs, a significant share of the benefits accrue as spillovers, and the research lags are very long. An accelerated investment in public agricultural R & D is warranted by the high returns to the nation, and may be necessary to revitalize U.S. agricultural productivity growth even though the benefits may not be visible for many years. Julian M. Alston is Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Director of the Robert Mondavi Institute Center for Wine Economics at the University of California, Davis and Associate Director for Science and Technology at the University of California Agricultural Issues Center Matthew A. Andersen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Wyoming Jennifer S. James is Associate Professor in the Department of Agribusiness at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Philip G. Pardey is Professor in the Department of Applied Economics and Director of the International Science and Technology Practice and Policy (InSTePP) Center at the University of Minnesota

lgrsnf/D:\!genesis\library.nu\3c\_106188.3c0a681678b45fcb9545d2cfa7f744c8.pdf

nexusstc/Persistence Pays: U.S. Agricultural Productivity Growth and the Benefits from Public R&D Spending/3c0a681678b45fcb9545d2cfa7f744c8.pdf

scihub/10.1007/978-1-4419-0658-8.pdf

Persistence pays : U.S. agricultural productivity growth and the benefits from public R & D spending

Julian M. Alston ... [et al.]

Springer New York : Imprint : Springer

Springer Nature

Natural resource management and policy, Natural resource management and policy, New York, New York State, 2010

Natural resource management and policy, 1st ed. 2010, New York, NY, 2010

Natural Resource Management and Policy, 1. Aufl, New York, NY, 2009

United States, United States of America

Springer Nature, New York, NY, 2009

1, 20091127

до 2011-01

sm22923934

{"edition":"1","isbns":["1441906576","1441906584","9781441906571","9781441906588"],"last_page":504,"publisher":"Springer New York","series":"Natural Resource Management and Policy 34"}

Includes bibliographical references (p. [465]-492) and index.

"Agricultural science policy in the United States has profoundly affected the growth and development of agriculture worldwide, not just in the A United States. Over the past 150 years, and especially over the second th half of the 20 Century, public investments in agricultural R & D in the United States grew faster than the value of agricultural production. Public spending on agricultural science grew similarly in other more-developed countries, and c- lectively these efforts, along with private spending, spurred agricultural prod- tivity growth in rich and poor nations alike. The value of this investment is seldom fully appreciated. The resulting p- ductivity improvements have released labor and other resources for alternative uses--in 1900, 29. 2 million Americans (39 percent of the population) were - rectly engaged in farming compared with just 2. 9 million (1. 1 percent) today-- while making food and fiber more abundant and cheaper. The benefits are not confined to Americans. U.S. agricultural science has contributed with others to growth in agricultural productivity in many other countries as well as the Un- ed States. The world's population more than doubled from around 3 billion in 1961 to 6. 54 billion in 2006 (U.S. Census Bureau 2009). Over the same period, production of important grain crops (including maize, wheat and rice) almost trebled, such that global per capita grain production was 18 percent higher in 2006"--Publisher's description

gricultural science policy in the United States has profoundly affected the growth and development of agriculture worldwide, not just in the A United States. Over the past 150 years, and especially over the second th half of the 20 Century, public investments in agricultural R&D in the United States grew faster than the value of agricultural production. Public spending on agricultural science grew similarly in other more-developed countries, and c- lectively these efforts, along with private spending, spurred agricultural prod- tivity growth in rich and poor nations alike. The value of this investment is seldom fully appreciated. The resulting p- ductivity improvements have released labor and other resources for alternative uses—in 1900, 29. 2 million Americans (39 percent of the population) were - rectly engaged in farming compared with just 2. 9 million (1. 1 percent) today— while making food and fiber more abundant and cheaper. The benefits are not confined to Americans. U. S. agricultural science has contributed with others to growth in agricultural productivity in many other countries as well as the Un- ed States. The world's population more than doubled from around 3 billion in 1961 to 6. 54 billion in 2006 (U. S. Census Bureau 2009). Over the same period, production of important grain crops (including maize, wheat and rice) almost trebled, such that global per capita grain production was 18 percent higher in 2006.

Front Matter....Pages i-xxx
Front Matter....Pages 1-1
Introduction....Pages 3-8
A Brief History of U.S. Agriculture....Pages 9-21
Front Matter....Pages 24-24
Agricultural Inputs....Pages 25-56
Agricultural Outputs....Pages 57-85
Agricultural Productivity Patterns....Pages 87-133
Front Matter....Pages 136-136
Research Funding and Performance....Pages 137-185
The Federal Role....Pages 187-236
Front Matter....Pages 238-238
Research Lags and Spillovers....Pages 239-269
Models of Research and Productivity....Pages 271-311
Econometric Estimation and Results....Pages 313-351
Productivity Patterns and Research Benefits....Pages 353-408
Front Matter....Pages 410-410
Interpretation and Assessment of Benefit-Cost Findings....Pages 411-451
Synthesis....Pages 453-463
Back Matter....Pages 465-502

2011-06-04