In this book, a leading scholar of comparative politics explores elections as instruments of democracy. Focusing on elections in twenty democracies over the past quarter century, G. Bingham Powell, Jr., examines the differences between two great visions of democracy—the majoritarian vision , in which citizens use the election process to choose decisively between two competing teams of policymakers, providing the winner with the concentrated power to make public policy; and the proportional influence vision , in which citizens use elections to choose political agents to represent their views in postelection bargaining, thereby dispersing power. Powell asks crucial questions for modern democracies: Which vision best serves as an instrument of democracy? What are the reasons and conditions under which each vision succeeds or fails?
Careful analyses of more than 150 democratic elections show that each vision succeeds fairly well on its own terms in responsively linking election outcomes to policymaker selection, although advantages and limitations must be traded off. However, Powell concludes, the proportional influence vision and its designs enjoy a clear advantage in creating policy congruence between citizens and their policymakers--a finding that should give pause to those who are attracted to the idea of the decisive election as a direct tool for citizen control.
About the Author:
G. Bingham Powell, Jr., is professor of political science at the University of Rochester.

Powell, G. Bingham

Bingham G Powell

New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Brandywine River Museum

Mariners' Museum, The

United States, United States of America

New Haven, Connecticut, 2000

New Haven, CT, cop. 2000

Illustrated, US, 2000

July 11, 2000

cut-off text

Includes bibliographical references (p. 283-292) and indexes.

In this book, a leading scholar of comparative politics explores elections as instruments of democracy. Focusing on elections in twenty democracies over the past quarter century, G. Bingham Powell, Jr., examines the differences between two great visions of democracy -- the majoritarian vision, in which citizens use the election process to choose decisively between two competing teams of policymakers, providing the winner with the concentrated power to make public policy; and the proportional influence vision, in which citizens use elections to choose political agents to represent their views in postelection bargaining, thereby dispersing power. Powell asks crucial questions for modern democracies: Which vision best serves as an instrument of democracy? What are the reasons and conditions under which each vision succeeds or fails?Careful analyses of more than 150 democratic elections show that each vision succeeds fairly well on its own terms in responsively linking election outcomes to policymaker selection, although advantages and limitations must be traded off. However, Powell concludes, the proportional influence vision and its designs enjoy a clear advantage in creating policy congruence between citizens and their policymakers -- a finding that should give pause to those who are attracted to the idea of the decisive election as a direct tool for citizen control.

xii, 298 pages : 24 cm
This text explores elections as instruments of democracy. Focusing on elections in 20 democracies over the last 25 years, it examines the differences between two visions of democracy - the majoritarian vision and the proportional influence vision
Includes bibliographical references (pages 283-292) and index
Elections as instruments of democracy -- Constitutional designs as visions of majoritarian or proportional democracy -- Accountability: conditions for citizen control -- Conditions for mandates: identifiability and majority -- A vision of dispersed political power: authorized representation in policy making -- Testing the vision: responsiveness in selecting governments and policymakers -- Citizen preferences and party positions -- The majoritarian policy vision: decisive elections, governments, and the median citizen -- The proportional influence vision: representing the median citizen through a multistage process -- Overview of the elections as instruments of democracy

2023-06-28