Philip A. Klinkner - Search - Anna’s Archive

ia/firstamendment0000klin.pdf

The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights. 1, The first amendment Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 168-170) and indexes Studies the historical origins of provisions of the First Amendment, which guarantees the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly, and the press 175 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 33.4MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/midtermelections0000unse.pdf

Midterm: The Elections Of 1994 In Context (Transforming American Politics) Klinkner, Philip A, Cammarano, Joe, Jones, Charles O, Jacobson, Gary, Ling, Benjamin D Westview Pr (Short Disc), Transforming American politics, Boulder, Colo, Colorado, 1996

By All Accounts, 1994 Represents Sweeping Electoral And Policy Change Rarely Seen In Any American Election, Let Alone In Midterm. This Book Puts 1994 In Context With Other Significant Midterm Elections, From 1810 To The Present. It Also Captures The Very Contemporary Concerns Unique To 1994: The Role Of The Religious Right, The Angry White Male, The Contract With America, And The Overall Tenor Of Antipathy As Voters Turned Out (or Not) To Show The Clinton Administration What They Thought Of Its First Two Years. This Collection Of Original Essays By Noted Political Scientists Gives Us The First Thoughtful Analysis Of The 1994 Election Results And Prepares Us To Anticipate The Certain Drama And Import Of The Elections Of 1996. The 1994 House Elections In Perspective / Gary C. Jacobson -- Eight More In '94: The Republican Takeover Of The Senate / Franco Mattei -- 'permanent Minority' No More: House Republicans In 1994 / John J. Pitney, Jr., And William F. Connelly, Jr. -- Court And Country In American Politics: The Democratic Party And The 1994 Election / Philip A. Klinkner -- Money In The 1994 Elections And Beyond / Theodore J. Eismeier And Philip H. Pollock Iii -- The 1994 Electoral Aftershock: Dealignment Or Realignment In The South / Paul Frymer -- The Politics Of Pragmatism: The Christian Right And The 1994 Elections / J. Christopher Soper -- In Search Of The Angry White Male: Gender, Race, And Issues In The 1994 Elections / Grant Reeher And Joseph Cammarano -- Re-exploring The Weak Challenger Hypothesis: The 1994 Candidate Pools / L. Sandy Maisel [and Others] -- Innovative Midterm Elections / David R. Mayhew. Edited By Philip A. Klinkner. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 171-182) And Index.

English [en] · PDF · 12.9MB · 1996 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

upload/degruyter/DeGruyter Partners/Yale University Press [NORETAIL]/10.12987_9780300163360_mg.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2020

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 5.8MB · 2020 · 📘 Book (non-fiction) · 🚀/lgli/lgrs/nexusstc/upload/zlib · Save

ia/unsteadymarchris00klin.pdf

The unsteady march : the rise and decline of racial equality in America Philip A. Klinkner with Rogers M. Smith University of Chicago Press ; Wiley, Chicago, Ill., Chichester, 1999

Philip A. Klinkner With Rogers M. Smith. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 353-406) And Index.

English [en] · PDF · 25.7MB · 1999 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia/zlib · Save

Your ad here.

ia/isbn_9780226443416.pdf

The unsteady march : the rise and decline of racial equality in America Klinkner, Philip A., Klinkner, Philip A., Smith, Rogers M. Chicago, Ill. ; London: University of Chicago Press, Paperback ed., Chicago, Ill., 2002

American life is filled with talk of progress and equality, especially when the issue is that of race. But has the history of race in America really been the continuous march toward equality we'd like to imagine it has? This sweeping history of race in America argues quite the that progress toward equality has been sporadic, isolated, and surrounded by long periods of stagnation and retrenchment. "[An] unflinching portrait of the leviathan of American race relations. . . . This important book should be read by all who aspire to create a more perfect union." Publishers Weekly , starred review "Could it be that our unswerving belief in the power of our core values to produce racial equality is nothing but a comforting myth? That is the main argument put forth by Philip Klinkner and Rogers Smith . . . The Unsteady March is disturbing because it calls into question our cherished national belief and does so convincingly. . . . [It] is beautifully written, and the social history it provides is illuminating and penetrating."Aldon Morris, American Journal of Sociology Winner of the Horace Mann Bond Award of the W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for Afro-American Research at Harvard University.

English [en] · PDF · 26.7MB · 2002 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/thirdamendment0000holm.pdf

The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights. 3, The third amendment Philip A Klinkner; Joan C Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 92-93) and indexes Studies the historical circumstances in the American colonies that eventually led to the drafting of the Third Amendment, which forbids the arbitrary quartering of troops in private homes 127 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 25.2MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/ninthamendment0000klin.pdf

The Ninth Amendment (The American Heritage : History of the Bill of Rights Series) Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 120-122) and indexes Discusses the origins and provisions of the Ninth Amendment, which protects "unenumerated" rights, or rights not listed in the Constitution 127 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 24.4MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/losingpartiesout0000klin.pdf

The losing parties: out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Klinkner, Philip A. New Haven: Yale University Press, New Haven; London, Unknown, 1994

How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.

English [en] · PDF · 10.9MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/secondamendment0000hawx.pdf

The Second Amendment (The American Heritage : History of the Bill of Rights Series) Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 131-134) and indexes Traces the historical origins of provisions of the Second Amendment: the right to keep and bear arms, and the maintenance of a militia 142 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 26.3MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

Your ad here.

ia/fifthamendment0000holm.pdf

The Fifth Amendment (The American Heritage : History of the Bill of Rights) Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-163) and indexes Traces the history of the several clauses of the Fifth Amendment: the right to a grand jury, due process, self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and eminent domain 172 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 33.1MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/seventhamendment0000summ.pdf

The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights. 7, The seventh amendment Philip A Klinkner; Joan C Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

Includes bibliographical references (pages 135-137) and indexes Studies the historical origins of the Seventh Amendment, which guarantees citizens the right of trial by jury in civil cases, or those cases involving money and property 142 pages : 27 cm

English [en] · PDF · 22.2MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/eighthamendment0000bura.pdf

The Eighth Amendment (The American Heritage : History of the Bill of Rights Series) Philip A Klinkner; Joan C Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

142 pages : 27 cm Studies the historical origins of provisions of the Eighth Amendment, which guards against excessive bail and fines and cruel and unusual punishments Includes bibliographical references (pages 133-135) and indexes

English [en] · PDF · 23.4MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/fourthamendment0000fran.pdf

The Fourth Amendment/by Paula A. Franklin ; with an introduction by a famous historian Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

143 pages : 27 cm Traces the origins of the Fourth Amendment, which speaks of citizens' rights in the matter of search and seizure Includes bibliographical references (pages 136-138) and index

English [en] · PDF · 9.6MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

ia/tenthamendment0000adam.pdf

The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights. 10, The tenth amendment Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, New Jersey, 1991

178 p. : Examines the provisions of the Tenth Amendment, which speaks of the powers of the Federal government in relation to the powers of individual states and the people Includes indexes Rj132,900 Includes bibliographical references

English [en] · PDF · 8.6MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

Your ad here.

ia/sixthamendment0000forc.pdf

The Sixth Amendment (The American Heritage : History of the Bill of Rights) Philip A. Klinkner; Joan C. Hawxhurst; Burnham Holmes; Paula Angle Franklin; Eden Force; Lila E. Summer; Vincent Buranelli; Judith Adams Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Silver Burdett Press, The American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, American heritage history of the Bill of Rights, Morristown, NJ, New Jersey, 1991

141 pages : 27 cm Studies the historical origins of provisions of the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees certain rights of trial to persons accused of crimes Includes bibliographical references (pages 135-136) and indexes

English [en] · PDF · 19.4MB · 1991 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/ia · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/009.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.4MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/013.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 1.0MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/008.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.5MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/006.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.3MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

Your ad here.

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/012.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.4MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/007.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.3MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/004.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.5MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/010.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.4MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/005.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.5MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

Your ad here.

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/011.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.3MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

hathi/mdp/pairtree_root/49/01/50/03/20/49/72/49015003204972/49015003204972.zip

Midterm : the elections of 1994 in context / edited by Philip A. Klinkner ; foreword by Charles O. Jones Klinkner, Philip A, Cammarano, Joe, Jones, Charles O, Jacobson, Gary, Ling, Benjamin D Westview Press, 1996, Transforming American politics, Boulder, Colo, Colorado, 1996

By All Accounts, 1994 Represents Sweeping Electoral And Policy Change Rarely Seen In Any American Election, Let Alone In Midterm. This Book Puts 1994 In Context With Other Significant Midterm Elections, From 1810 To The Present. It Also Captures The Very Contemporary Concerns Unique To 1994: The Role Of The Religious Right, The Angry White Male, The Contract With America, And The Overall Tenor Of Antipathy As Voters Turned Out (or Not) To Show The Clinton Administration What They Thought Of Its First Two Years. This Collection Of Original Essays By Noted Political Scientists Gives Us The First Thoughtful Analysis Of The 1994 Election Results And Prepares Us To Anticipate The Certain Drama And Import Of The Elections Of 1996. The 1994 House Elections In Perspective / Gary C. Jacobson -- Eight More In '94: The Republican Takeover Of The Senate / Franco Mattei -- 'permanent Minority' No More: House Republicans In 1994 / John J. Pitney, Jr., And William F. Connelly, Jr. -- Court And Country In American Politics: The Democratic Party And The 1994 Election / Philip A. Klinkner -- Money In The 1994 Elections And Beyond / Theodore J. Eismeier And Philip H. Pollock Iii -- The 1994 Electoral Aftershock: Dealignment Or Realignment In The South / Paul Frymer -- The Politics Of Pragmatism: The Christian Right And The 1994 Elections / J. Christopher Soper -- In Search Of The Angry White Male: Gender, Race, And Issues In The 1994 Elections / Grant Reeher And Joseph Cammarano -- Re-exploring The Weak Challenger Hypothesis: The 1994 Candidate Pools / L. Sandy Maisel [and Others] -- Innovative Midterm Elections / David R. Mayhew. Edited By Philip A. Klinkner. Includes Bibliographical References (p. 171-182) And Index.

English [en] · ZIP · 0.3MB · 1996 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/hathi · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/015.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.2MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/001.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.1MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/000.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.1MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

Your ad here.

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/002.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.1MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/003.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.2MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save

upload/cgiym_more/Nozomi's/YaleNORETAIL/10.12987_9780300163360/014.pdf

The losing parties : out-party national committees, 1956-1993 Philip A. Klinkner Yale University Press, New Haven ; London, 1994

<div>How do Democratic and Republican party leaders react after their party has lost a presidential election? Is there a pattern of response to defeat that reflects the distinctive cultures of the two parties? This book answers these questions by examining how the two national party organizations have responded to presidential election defeats between 1956 and 1993. <BR><BR>Drawing on party documents, interviews with party officials, and contemporary accounts, Philip Klinkner provides detailed case studies of opposition party politics. He shows that Republican national committees have reacted to losses by making organizational changes to improve campaign technology and fundraising and that losing Democrats have sought to refine or make more democratic their internal procedures for selecting delegates to the national convention or for choosing presidential candidates. Klinkner suggests that the reasons for these reactions stem from the historical development of the parties. The organizational response of the Republican party is the result of its long-term relationship with business, its homogeneity and hierarchical structure, and its minority party experience. The Democrats' emphasis on participation and representation for its constituent elements is based on its characteristic composition of social and economic out-groups, its heterogeneity and decentralization, and its tradition as the majority party.</div>

English [en] · PDF · 0.1MB · 1994 · 📗 Book (unknown) · 🚀/upload · Save