This condensed version of her dissertation is from:
Popik, Kristin M. “[The Philosophy of Woman of St. Thomas Aquinas (Part 1)](https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=2793).” *Faith & Reason* 4, no. 4 (Winter 1978): 16–56.
———. “[The Philosophy of Woman of St. Thomas Aquinas (Part 2)](https://media.christendom.edu/1979/03/the-philosophy-of-woman-of-st-thomas-aquinas/).” *Faith & Reason* 5, no. 1 (Spring 1979).
cited in [Petri 2016](https://isidore.co/calibre/browse/book/6556) p. 279fn76
Popik is the first woman to graduate from the Angelicum, so she's a "[Pia de Solenni](http://piadesolenni.com/)."
Only criticism is that she seemed to think St. Thomas relied too much on Aristotle's "biological" position that the man is the active principle in generation; however, this is more by definition: father is active principle of life; mother is passive principle.
Also, she doesn't mention St. Thomas's philogynist position that woman is the perfection of creation ([ *Summa Theologica* I q. 92 a. 1 "Whether the woman should have been made in the first production of things?"](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/FP/FP092.html#FPQ92A1THEP1) ad 3: "If God had deprived the world of all those things which proved an occasion of sin, the universe would have been imperfect."; [source](https://christianity.stackexchange.com/a/50215/1787)).
* * *
Men and women belong to the same species (ref:1.8):
> But the form of a thing determines its nature or essence, gives the thing its definition, and makes it part of a species.[2](javascript:void\(0\)) What a thing is, then. is determined by the form of that thing, not specifically by its matter. Since men and women both have the same substantial form of rational soul, they have the same human nature, they are essentially equal and belong to the same species.[3](javascript:void\(0\))
> [2](javascript:void\(0\)). [In Met. Exp. II, 4](https://isidore.co/aquinas/Metaphysics2.htm#4).
> [3](javascript:void\(0\)). [S.T. I, 93, 4](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/FP/FP093.html#FPQ93A4THEP1), ad 1.
Insightful arguments into [St. Thomas's commentary on John 4](https://isidore.co/aquinas/John4.htm), lect. 2, where Jesus say to the woman at the well to fetch her husband (i.e., be prepared to think about higher things); Popik (ref:1.96): "He commends her understanding and her diligence in seeking truth, and contrasts her with most women who when idle are merely curious about the future, and about worldly things and other people’s affairs."
[Sobriety](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/SS/SS149.html#SSQ149OUTP1) and the (non-virtue) of *verecundia* ([shamefacedness](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/SS/SS144.html#SSQ144OUTP1), not DRC's "[modesty](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/SS/SS160.html#SSQ160OUTP1)"; [original Rheims](https://isidore.co/calibre#panel=book_details&book_id=4514), PDF p. 456 says more correctly: "demureness") are "'ornaments' of virtue" that "safeguard what little reasoning and ordering abilities they have, and make up for woman’s natural lack of the internal beauty which results from this ordering of acts with reason" (ref:1.100); cf. [In I ad Tim. II, 2, 75](https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~1Tim.C2.L2.n75).
St. Thomas thinks females can sponsor male confirmands (ref:1.140), citing [III q. 73 a. 10](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/TP/TP072.html#TPQ72A10THEP1) arg./ad 3: "([Gal. 3:28](http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/s?b=drl&q=Gal++3%3A28)), 'in Christ Jesus there is neither male nor female." Consequently it matters not whether a man or a woman stand for one who is to be confirmed.'", showing that men and women are equals in the order of grace. (cf. [1917 can.](https://isidore.co/calibre#panel=book_details&book_id=7786) 796 "2° That he [or she] be of the same sex as the one being confirmed unless in particular cases it seems to the minister there are reasonable causes to do otherwise", ref:16.354.)
ref:2.48: "the husband’s rule of his wife is for the common good of the familial society, it is limited to those matters which affect that common good. The wife’s personal life remains untouched by her husband’s authority"
Part 2, §"Women Outside Domestic Society" cites [II-II q. 32 a. 8](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/SS/SS032.html#SSQ32A8THEP1) to show that a wife can have her own income and funds separate from that of the household. She also (unconvincingly) claims that "Thomas never states as a starting principle that all women must be subject to some man." (ref:2.56).
She argues that St. Thomas didn't think all women must be subject to a man (widows being the exception; cf. St. John Chrysostom, [*Against Remarriage*](https://isidore.co/calibre#panel=book_details&book_id=6549), PDF pp. 250-1), but young virgins are to be subject to their fathers, and wives to their husbands; older virgins, like widows, are subject directly to the civil authority.
St. Thomas never discussed [single women living in the world](https://isidore.co/calibre#panel=book_details&book_id=7140)? Popik claims St. Thomas didn't consider singleness a vocation (ref:2.62):
> Thomas says nothing about single women beyond these treatments of their relative subjection to and freedom from parental authority, suggesting that he considered single women to be those who, because they had not yet entered either religion or matrimony, were still under their fathers’ care until they selected one or the other of these states. In fact, when St. Thomas gives examples of the states of life which daughters may freely choose, he names only these.
* * *
ref:1.99ff on women's lower reasoning vs. men's higher reasoning:
> For Aquinas then woman is generally less perfected in wisdom than man is, she is less able to do higher reasoning about eternal things and usually sticks to lower reasoning about temporal things; in men the reason is more developed so that they are more proficient at contemplation and wiser, and hence the man must direct the woman as higher reason directs the lower.
> Closely connected with woman’s relative deficiency in higher reasoning is her inferiority in comparison with the man in those virtues, which depend on the directive role of reason. Because it belongs to reason to order acts and effects, and because women are weak of reason, they are less able to order their acts; hence they have great need of the “ornaments” of virtue, especially sobriety and *verecundia* which safeguard what little reasoning and ordering abilities they have, and make up for woman’s natural lack of the internal beauty which results from this ordering of acts with reason:
> Quia naturale est quod sicut mulieres sunt mollioris corporis quam viri, ita et debilioris rationis. Rationis autem est ordinare actus, et effectus uniuscuiusque rei. Ornatus vero consistit in debita ordinatione et dispositione. Sic in interiori decore nisi sint omnia ordinata ex dispositione per rationem, non habent pulchritudinem spiritualem. Et ideo quia mulieres deficiunt a ratione, requirit ab eis ornatum.
> {[[1 Tim. 2:9](http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drl&bk=61&ch=2&l=9-#x):] *in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty*. The reason for this is that since it is natural for women to be softer of body than men, so too they are weaker in [higher] reason. But it pertains to reason to arrange the acts and effects of each thing. Now decency ( *ornatus* ) consists in being ordained and disposed in due order. Thus, in regard to internal beauty ( *decore* ), unless everything is properly arranged by reason, they do not have spiritual beauty. Consequently, because women are deficient in [higher] reason, he requires external ornamentation ( *ornatum* ) of them.}
> Item verecundia est de turpi actu, et ideo est laudabilis in illis qui facile solent declinare in actus turpes, cuiusmodi sunt iuvenes et mulieres, et ideo hoc in eis laudatur, non autem senes et perfecti...
> Item sobrietatem requirit; unde sequitur et sobrietate. Quia enim in mulieribus ratio est debilis, sobrietas autem conservat virtutem rationis, ideo in mulieribus maxime reprehenditur ebrietas. [[In I ad Tim. II, 2, 75.](https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~1Tim.C2.L2.n75)]
"regarding internal beauty ( *decore* ), unless everything [ *omnia* , incl. external dress] is properly arranged by reason, they do not have spiritual beauty." ∴, external dress being "properly arranged by reason" leads to "spiritual beauty" (internal order). Viz., women become more intelligent and are able to exercise higher reason better if they dress beautifully/modestly.
* * *
* H. Goodall and A. M. Roberts, “[Differences in Motility of Human X- and Y-Bearing Spermatozoa](https://isidore.co/misc/Physics%20papers%20and%20books/Zotero/storage/BHA8AKD4/Goodall%20e%20Roberts%20-%201976%20-%20Differences%20in%20motility%20of%20human%20X-%20and%20Y-bearing%20.pdf),” *Reproduction* 48, no. 2 (November 1, 1976): 433–36
corroborates the Aristotelian-Thomistic view that the male is the active principle of generation and the conception of a female is due to a defect:
[I q. 92 a. 1](https://isidore.co/aquinas/summa/FP/FP092.html#FPQ92A1THEP1) ad 1:
> the active force in the male seed tends to the production of a perfect likeness in the masculine sex; while the production of woman comes from defect in the active force
Read more…