Perspectives in Indian Art & Archaeology, no. 7
Prehistory and Protohistory of India
—An Appraisal—
Palaeolithic—Non-Harappan Chalcolithic Cultures
V.K.Jain
.
■
.
foreword
Prof. D.N. Jha
D.K. Printworld (P) Ltd.
New Delhi
Cataloging in Publication Data — DK
[Courtesy: D.K. Agencies (P) Ltd. ]
Jain, V.K. (Vardhman Kumar), 1944-
Prehistory and protohistory of India : an appraisal : palaeolithic, non-Harappan, Chalcolithic cultures / V.K. Jain.
xvii, 213 p., 23 cm.
(Perspectives in Indian art & archaeology, no. 7)
Includes bibliographical references (p. )
Includes index.
ISBN 8124603723 (Hb)
ISBN 8124603731 (Pb)
1. Prehistoric peoples — India. 2. Protohistory. 3. India — Civilization — To 1200. 4. India — Antiquities. I. Title. II. Series : Perspectives in Indian art & archaeology, no. 7.
DDC 934 22
ISBN 81-246-0372-3 (Hardbound) ISBN 81-246-0373-1 (Paperback)
First Published in India in 2006 Second impression appeared in 2009 © Author
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior written permission of both the copyright owner, indicated above, and the publisher.
Published and printed by:
D.K. Printworld (p)[Ltd.
Regd. office : "Srikunj," F-52, Bali Nagar
Ramesh Nagar Metro Station, New Delhi - 110 015
Phones : (Oil) 2545-3975; 2546-6019; Fax : (Oil) 2546-5926
E-mail: dkprintworld@vsnl.net
Web: www.dkprintworld.com
Dedicated
as a token of respect and gratitude
to
Professor R.S. Sharma
Foreword
Much work has been done in the field of Indian archaeology during the last fifty years or so as is evident from the large number of explorations and excavations that have been undertaken during this period and from the vast amount of literature that has been generated by archaeologists. Although many excavation reports have remained unpublished, scholars have made good use of whatever material is available in print and have deepened our understanding of India's past. The information and interpretation contained in the archaeological literature, however, have yet to find their due place in the textbooks and become accessible to teachers as well as students. The present work by Dr. V.K. Jain is a commendable effort in this direction.
An inspiring teacher of long standing and a dedicated researcher, Dr. V.K. Jain has painstakingly rummaged through the entire relevant literature and has ably tried to assimilate the available data. Unswayed by any trendy and fashionable approach he has dealt with controversial issues in a highly detached manner and has presented a comprehensive view of the latest information on tools and technologies, subsistence patterns, and distribution and ecological background of settlements during the period from the Palaeolithic to the non-Harappan Chalcolithic. The appendix on the megalithic cultures of Central India and the Deccan, the line drawings of tools, and the explanatory notes on important archaeological sites
viii Prehistory and Protohistory of India: An Appraisal
accompanied by maps are some of the important features of the book which make it extremely useful for the readers. I am sure the students as well as teachers will find Dr. Jain's book an indispensable handbook on Indian prehistory and protohistory and will eagerly wait for the publication of its companion volume on the Harappan culture.
D.N. Jha
Former Professor of History University of Delhi
f
Preface
resh excavations, new dating techniques and ever-growing onceptual frameworks during the last half-a-century have reatly reshaped our perspective on Prehistoric and rotohistoric past of the Indian subcontinent. But still most of ie books and articles on the subject, with the exception of lose by D.K. Chakrabarti, F.R. Allchin, D.P. Agarwal, K. addayya and a few others, continue to follow the traditional culture-history" paradigm or collection and narration pproach rather than focus on the cultural process of change rid continuity. Since 1950, the pace of research has increased lanifold and there is today enough data to portray more or iss a clear and connected picture of India's cultural growth i the remote past, and to justify the argument that there is othing 'static' about Indian society which, as any other, has een growing with time and space.
This monograph is an attempt to present, in a concise but amprehensive manner, a syncretic view of the latest iformation on tools and technologies, settlement-subsistence attern, distributional framework and ecological background, tc, in respect of Prehistory and Protohistory of India. It ?vers a canvas extending from the Palaeolithic to the non-[arappan Chalcolithic Cultures and leaves out the Harappan ivilization for the subsequent volume. It begins with an iquiry into the definition of Prehistory and Protohistory and oes on to refer to the significance of latest dating techniques
x Prehistory and Protohistory of India: An Appraisal
and theoretical perspectives in archaeology. Chapter-II reviews the contribution which Indian archaeological studies since 1950 have made to our knowledge. In the subsequent chapters, the salient features of Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and non-Harappan Chalcolithic Cultures have been highlighted. The chief elements of the iron-using Megalithic Cultures of peninsular India and the Deccan (c. 1000 bc - 300 bc), the information about which is obtained exclusively from the archaeological excavations, have been discussed in the Appendix which also includes a glossary of important terms frequently used in archaeological as well as the explanatory notes on prominent sites mentioned in the text.
This book is an enlarged version of the chapters initially intended for inclusion in an advanced level text-book by a multi-scholar team and, therefore, it naturally has a studenl oriented format though a general reader who is inquisitive enough to know more about India's remotest past may alsc find it beneficial. The biggest difficulty in writing a text oi this nature lies in deciding what to include and what to exclude And for this I have taken the liberty of using my academic experience and discretion because in a subject which is so ful of details and unresolved issues and controversies, it is jus not possible to do justice to each and every fact oi interpretation. It has been my endeavour to draw ; compromise between the extremes of technicality anc generality, and confine more to highlighting the importan features of cultural growth. Archaeological jargons have beei kept to the minimum and, whenever used, they have beei fully explained in the text or in the glossary at the end. Fo the purpose of conveying the visual interpretation, line drawings, illustrations and maps have been included wherever required. For a reader who is stimulated enough ti know more, a select bibliography is appended to the texl
reface xi
ome repetition and errors of facts or spellings may no doubt jmain. The author will be delighted to receive from anyone ie suggestions for corrections or improvements.
I shall like to place on record my gratitude to all those :holars whose contributions have been utilized fruitfully in siting this book.
I also wish to gratefully acknowledge the support and ncouragement that I received from Prof. B.P. Sahu, Head, epartment of History, Delhi University and Prof. R.C. hakran, also of the Delhi University. I am thankful to many f my friends and well-wishers at the National Museum, the Lrchaeological Survey of India and the Motilal Nehru College )r their help in many ways. My thanks are due to Shri D.P. harma, In-Charge Prehistory Section at the National Museum, >elhi for readily helping with the books, articles and nggestions whenever needed. I am grateful to Dr. Nagarch, jrmerly Director of the Archaeological Survey of India, for oing through the proofs and making valuable comments.
I am thankful to the library staff of the Archaeological urvey of India and the National Museum, particularly Shri hagwan Chaube, for providing me with all possible assistance i procuring the material necessary for writing the book.
I am highly indebted to Prof. D.N. Jha, a scholar of iternational repute and the General President of the Indian listory Congress (66th session, Santiniketan), who, in spite f a very busy schedule and numerous obligations, has been ind enough to oblige me with a foreword for this book.
I shall like to record my great sense of appreciation for le personal interest which Shri Susheel Mittal of the D.K. rintworld (P) Ltd. took in bringing about the book in a record ime.
xii Prehistory and Protohistory of India: An Appraisal
Last but not the least, my thanks go to my wife Dr. Krishna Jain and my son Siddharth for supporting me all through this task of preparing the manuscript with love, patience and good humour.
I take the privilege of dedicating this book, as a token of regard and gratitude, to Prof. R.S. Sharma who has throughout been devoted to the task of promoting secular and scientific approach in Indological studies. As the founder-Chairman of the Indian Council of Historical Research, New Delhi, he was instrumental in giving a positive direction to historical studies, whereas at the University of Delhi, where he was a Professor and the Head of the Department of History in 1970s, he had generated among students a new sense of enthusiasm and encouragement for research on various aspects of social and economic history. Those of us who have been associated with him, either as a student or a researcher, can never forget his kindness, grace and commitment to the subject.
■
Contents
Foreword vii
Preface ix
List of Maps and Figures xvii
Introduction 1
What is Prehistory? 1
Environmental Factors 4
Human Evolution and Indian Prehistory 5
Scientific Dating and Related Techniques 9
New Theoretical Perspectives 14
Indian Archaeological Studies During the 19 Last Five Decades and their Significance
Palaeolithic Cultures
39
Introduction
39
Chronology
40
Tools and Technologies
41
Spread and Distribution of Palaeolithic Sites
49
Settlement and Subsistence Pattern
52
Conclusion
55
Mesolithic Cultures
57
Introduction
57
Salient Features
57
Regional Distribution
60
Tools and Technologies
63
xiv
Prehistory and Protohistory of India: An Appraisal
6.
Material Culture and Subsistence Pattern
Conclusion
Rock Art
Neolithic Cultures
Introduction
Characteristic Features
Chronological and Distributional Pattern
North-West India
Northern India
Central India
Mid-Gangetic Region
Eastern India
Southern Neolithic Cultures Conclusion
Non-Harappan Chalcolithic Cultures
Introduction
Cultures Outside the Harappan Zone
Settlement System
Subsistence Pattern
Tools and Technologies
Trade Contacts
Religious Beliefs and Practices
Conclusion
Copper-Hoard Cultures
Appendices
Appendix I : Megalithic Cultures (Peninsular India and the Deccan c. 1000 bc - 300 bc)
Introduction
Distribution of the Megalithic Monuments and their Structural Forms
Chronology
65 67 68
Prehistory and Protohistory of India: An Appraisal
Material Culture and Subsistence Pattern
Conclusion
Rock Art
Neolithic Cultures
Introduction
Characteristic Features
Chronological and Distributional Pattern
North-West India
Northern India
Central India
Mid-Gangetic Region
Eastern India
Southern Neolithic Cultures Conclusion
Non-Harappan Chalcolithic Cultures
Introduction
Cultures Outside the Harappan Zone
Settlement System
Subsistence Pattern
Tools and Technologies
Trade Contacts
Religious Beliefs and Practices
Conclusion
Copper-Hoard Cultures
Appendices
Appendix I : Megalithic Cultures (Peninsular India and the Deccan c. 1000 bc - 300 bc)
Introduction
Distribution of the Megalithic Monuments
and their Structural Forms
Chronology
ntents
xv
Material Culture 124
Subsistence Economy 127
Conclusion 129
Appendix II : Prominent Sites 133
Adamgarh, 133 — Adichanallur, 134 — Ahar, 135 — Anagwadi, 136 — Attirampakkam or Attiramabakkam, 136 — Baghor, 137 — Bagor, 137 — Belan Valley, 138 — Bhimbetka, 139 — Brahmagiri, 141 — Budihal, 143 — Burzahom, 143 — Chirand, 145 — Chopani-Mando, 146
Damdama, 147 — Daojali Hading, 147 — Didwana, 148 — Gilund, 148 — Gufkral, 149
Hallur, 150 — Hunsgi, 150 — Inamgaon, 151 — Takhera, 153 — Jodhpura, 153 — Jorwe, 154 — Kayatha, 155 — Koldihwa, 156 — Kuchai, 157 — Kupgal or Kupgallu, 157 — Langhnaj, 158 — Mahadaha, 159 — Mahagara, 160 — Mahisdal, 160 — Mahurjhari, 161 — Maski, 162 — Mehrgarh, 163 — Naikund, 165 — Navadatoli, 165 — Nevasa, 166 — Noh, 167 — Paisra, 168 — Paiyampalli, 168 — Pandu Rajar Dhibi, 169 — Piklihal, 170 — Sanaganakallu, 171 — Sarai Nahar Rai, 172 — Savalda, 173 — Takalghata, 173 — Tekkalakota, 174 — Utnur, 175 — Watgal, 175
Glossary 177
Bibliography and References 199
Index 207
List of Maps and Figures
Prehistoric Tool Techniques
Palaeolithic Tools
Principal Sites of Palaeolithic Cultures
Principal Sites of Mesolithic Cultures and Rock Paintings
Some Mesolithic and Neolithic Tools
Rock Art from Central India
Rock Art from Central India
Principal Sites of Neolithic Cultures
Non-Harappan Chalcolithic and Copper-Hoard Sites
Copper-Hoard Objects
Principal Sites of Megalithic Cultures
Forms of Megalithic Structures
Prominent Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sites
1
Introduction
What is Prehistory?
Prehistory refers to that phase of human history when earth was still taking shape and man was evolving biologically through various extinct species from the primates to its present form. It is a history of early man's struggle for survival in adverse environment and is marked by his steady progress from an animal-hunting and wild food-collecting wandering life to that of a food-producing and cattle-herding settled life.
Since early human did not know writing, his artifacts, i.e. the things which are deliberately fashioned by him to meet his needs and requirements, such as tools of stone, bone or any other material, pottery, pieces of ornaments, etc. form the only source which stand mute witness to his cultural and material progress. Besides these, the traces of huts, hearths, querns and burials too help us in gaining information on the life-pattern and thought-process of the early humans. During the last half a century, the fresh excavations and new dating techniques along with growing multi-disciplinary approach have not only greatly added to our knowledge but have also changed our perspective and understanding of Prehistory. Today, the Prehistoric tools and artifacts are treated not an end but as the means to understand early
3
2 Prehistory and Protohistory of India: A Reappraisal
human's endeavour to feed and protect himself in adverse climatic conditions.
In archaeological terminology, there are, besides "Prehistory," two other phases in which human civilization is divided, and these are termed as "Protohistory" and "History." Protohistory is a period when man had become literate but on account of our inability to decipher his records, as in the case of the Harappan Civilization, the data derived from the discovered material objects remains unsupplemented, and our information on his life pattern continues to be hazy and incomplete. Protohistory is also treated as a phase that bridges the gulf between c. 3000 bc and 600 bc. The period referred to as "History," on the other hand, is the one when we come across ample records in the form of literary texts and epigraphs which help us to cross-examine the data and help us in reinforcing our knowledge on human history with greater precision.
Chronologically, Prehistory covers the largest period of human history. Since stone was the chief material that was used by early man to procure food or to protect himself, this period is also described as the Stone Age. In Europe the study of Prehistory began in the mid-nineteenth century when Christian J. Thomsen, a Danish Scholar, for the first time in 1836 defined the past of human society in terms of technological and chronological stages marked by the successive use of tools made of stone, bronze and iron (called Three-Age System). In 1851, Daniel Wilson coined the term Prehistory, and in 1865 John Lubbock used the terms Palaeolithic and Neolithic to emphasize the change and progress in tool-types. Documentation of evidence for the Stone Age in India began with the first discovery of a hand-axe at Pallavaram near Madras (now Chennai) by Robert B.
Introduction
Foote, called Father of Indian Prehistory, in 1863. Since then, particularly during the last five decades, there has been a significant progress in Indian archaeological studies which have enriched greatly our knowledge of the remote past of the Indian subcontinent (see next chapter).
Prehistory of India, as elsewhere, is divided into three broad periods — Palaeolithic (pa/eo-old, lithic-stone i.e., Old Stone Age), Mesolithic (meso-middle, lithic-stone, i.e., Middle Stone Age) and, Neolithic (neo-new, lithic-stone, i.e., New Stone Age). Each of these periods is marked by distinct features as well as gradual improvement in tool-making skill and technology. Thus, while the Palaeolithic period witnessed a shift from heavy and asymmetrical to flake-based tools, the Mesolithic period was characterized by the use of "microliths" or small "geometric tools" in the form of triangles, crescents, etc. The Neolithic period, the last phase of Prehistory, was marked by the use of polished and ground tools having better and sharper cutting edge. This period also witnessed the emergence of first farming communities, i.e., the communities which domesticated plants and animals, used pottery and lived in hut-like structures in different ecozones of the country.
Since tools and tool-technologies have a direct impact on the production capacity and material life of the human beings, gradual improvement in tool-types from Palaeolithic to Neolithic period is viewed as a primary factor which led to change in early human's subsistence pattern from hunting and gathering to food-production. This concept of reciprocal relationship between technological growth and material progress was first expounded by Gordon Childe (1892-1957) and later popularised by Braidwood and others. Childe used the term "Neolithic Revolution" to emphasize the dynamic impact which the beginning of farming and settled life had on
4 Prehistory and Protohistory of India: A Reappraisal
Introduction
5
human kind during the Neolithic period. But the new archaeological data tends to reveal that the transition to farming was one of gradualness and what one notices is more of a "transformation" or "evolution" rather than a "revolution" (see Chapter 5).
Environmental Factors
The physical environment is viewed by many scholars as a major determining factor which influenced the process of change and progress during the Prehistoric times. The physical environment is characterised by topography, climate and the nature of soil which in turn determine the fauna (animal life) and flora (vegetation) — the two primary sources of subsistence for the early humans.
Palaeolithic period covered the Pleistocene (Greek term for "most recent") or the "Ice-age" dated from around 2 m.y.a (million years ago) to 10,000 BP (Before Present). It was an age when a large part of the world was covered by ice-sheets and the climate was extremely cold and arid. As this climate could sustain only limited flora and fauna in the form of bushes and hedges, giant animals with thick and hairy skin, the human ancestors had limited food resources and they lived the life of hunter-gatherers or scavengers. But with the onset of Holocene (a Greek term for "recent") period in around 10,000 BP, there was a change in climate which became warm and wet, very much like the present one. It resulted in the melting of snow and the formation of rivers and forests; even the animals became smaller and swifter. This climatic change made available not only new resources but also created opportunity for early humans for production of cereals and domestication of animals, ultimately enabling them to move from hunting-gathering to food-production and settled life.
The theory that the change in early human's life pattern was on account of change in environment is known as "environmental determinism." In its essence it means that humans are a component element of physical environment, and their life and activities are conditioned and governed by it. However, this theory is not fully accepted presently. It is argued that physical surroundings do play an important role in determining human activities but it does not mean that we humans are passive robots helplessly programmed to act according to the climatic conditions. The physical environment permits and at times even restricts the use of certain resources, but a human being is capable enough to overcome the hurdles in the path of progress through his skill and endeavour. It is argued that many other factors, such as cultural traditions, i.e. earlier experience, cultural contact i.e., social and economic interaction with other contemporary social groups, and demographic profile, i.e., the need to feed larger number of people, are also possible factors which could trigger a change. In short, many factors in combination, not the physical environment alone, may encourage technological innovations leading to progress in material and cultural life.
It may be worthwhile to note here that Indian Prehistory, on the whole, presents a picture of "cultural continuum" — a process in which each step marks a further growth or evolution over the earlier one. There is nothing static about Indian society and, as in other parts of the world, lithic technology in India too evolved gradually from heavier to smaller and sharper tools, creating necessary conditions for stage-wise cultural growth.
Human Evolution and Indian Prehistory
Prehistory is intimately connected with the evolution of man and his efforts to survive in adverse environment through
4 Prehistory and Protohistory of India: A Reappraisal
Introduction 5
human kind during the Neolithic period. But the new archaeological data tends to reveal that the transition to farming was one of gradualness and what one notices is more of a "transformation" or "evolution" rather than a "revolution" (see Chapter 5).
Environmental Factors
The physical environment is viewed by many scholars as a major determining factor which influenced the process of change and progress during the Prehistoric times. The physical environment is characterised by topography, climate and the nature of soil which in turn determine the fauna (animal life) and flora (vegetation) — the two primary sources of subsistence for the early humans.
Palaeolithic period covered the Pleistocene (Greek term for "most recent") or the "Ice-age" dated from around 2 m.y.a (million years ago) to 10,000 BP (Before Present). It was an age when a large part of the world was covered by ice-sheets and the climate was extremely cold and arid. As this climate could sustain only limited flora and fauna in the form of bushes and hedges, giant animals with thick and hairy skin, the human ancestors had limited food resources and they lived the life of hunter-gatherers or scavengers. But with the onset of Holocene (a Greek term for "recent") period in around 10,000 BP, there was a change in climate which became warm and wet, very much like the present one. It resulted in the melting of snow and the formation of rivers and forests; even the animals became smaller and swifter. This climatic change made available not only new resources but also created opportunity for early humans for production of cereals and domestication of animals, ultimately enabling them to move from hunting-gathering to food-production and settled life.
The theory that the change in early human's life pattern was on account of change in environment is known as "environmental determinism." In its essence it means that humans are a component element of physical environment, and their life and activities are conditioned and governed by it. However, this theory is not fully accepted presently. It is argued that physical surroundings do play an important role in determining human activities but it does not mean that we humans are passive robots helplessly programmed to act according to the climatic conditions. The physical environment permits and at times even restricts the use of certain resources, but a human being is capable enough to overcome the hurdles in the path of progress through his skill and endeavour. It is argued that many other factors, such as cultural traditions, i.e. earlier experience, cultural contact i.e., social and economic interaction with other contemporary social groups, and demographic profile, i.e., the need to feed larger number of people, are also possible factors which could trigger a change. In short, many factors in combination, not the physical environment alone, may encourage technological innovations leading to progress in material and cultural life.
It may be worthwhile to note here that Indian Prehistory, on the whole, presents a picture of "cultural continuum" — a process in which each step marks a further growth or evolution over the earlier one. There is nothing static about Indian society and, as in other parts of the world, lithic technology in India too evolved gradually from heavier to smaller and sharper tools, creating necessary conditions for stage-wise cultural growth. .
Human Evolution and Indian Prehistory
Prehistory is intimately connected with the evolution of man and his efforts to survive in adverse environment through
6 Prehistory and Protohistory of India: A Reappraisal
technological modification of his tools and weapons. Though the earth was formed around 4,600 m.y.a (million years ago) and organic life appeared in the form of algae or seaweed as far back as some 2,000 m.y.a., the man emerged much later as a result of a long and gradual process of biological change in the last geological epoch called Quarternary period which is subdivided into two phases — (i) Pleistocene and (ii) Holocene.
All humans, zoologically speaking, belong to a family called hominid, having the genus or structural characteristics called homo. Initially, they along with apes and gibbons formed a part of a group called the primates, the earliest order of mammals. At some point of time, the hominids, for uncertain reasons, diverged from the apes and gradually developed into modern man through various, now extinct, sub-species such as Homo habilis (handy-man), Homo erectus (upright-man) and Homo sapiens (wise-man).
From biological point of view, the human evolution was marked by three distinct functional features — (i) perfect bipedal instead of guadrupedal locomotion; it is associated with the modification of pelvis and lower extremities; (ii) changes in the upper part of the body; it resulted in rotating movement of the shoulders; and (iii) increase in the cranial capacity or brain size — the brain size of modern man is estimated to be 1200-1450 cc, roughly three times that of his most ancient ancestor. The significance of these changes is that whereas bipedalism permitted man to use hands, now freed from walking, to make and use tools, the brain size made him plan and evolve new strategies in search for food.
It is now generally believed that the oldest member of the human family who walked, though partially, on two legs appeared first in the tropical or sub-tropical belt of Africa, away from the ice-barrier, about 4 m.y.a. or may be even
Introduction 7
earlier. This bow-legged ape-man is called Australopithecine africanus (lit. Southern ape of Africa). His fossils have been recovered from various places in central and eastern part of Africa. Its upright position is indicated by the foot-prints found on cold lava-ash at Laetoli (Tanzania), and from the small skeleton of a female nick-named Lucy, discovered at Hadar (Ethiopia) in 1974. While the foot-prints are dated around 3.8 m.y.a., the "Lucy" skeleton is estimated to be 3.2 m.y. old. This species is not associated with any type of tools. The earliest known evidence of stone tools found in association with hominid fossils are reported from Hadar (Ethiopia) and are considered to be 2.3 million years old. These tools are made on pebbles by striking one against the other to get a sharp edge and are called Oldowan because such tools were first recovered from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. In spite of some difference of opinion, the scholars by and large agree with Leakey and Tobias, the anthropodogists, that these tools were the product of a later species called Homo habilis (the handyman) who happen to be the earliest tool-makers. What is significant here is the recognition of the fact that around 2.5 m.y.a. human ancestors had started making tools which in the course of time gave them mastery over their environment. The Homo habilis survived from 2.5 m.y.a. to 1.5 m.y.a. when there developed a new species called Homo erectus from whom emerged ultimately Homo sapien sapiens around 40,000 BP (Before Present). An important feature of the human evolution is that with each new species we notice a progressive improvement and refinement in tool-types.
An important discovery made by early man was that of fire, traditionally ascribed to the Homo erectus. It provided, him light, heat and protection from predators. It also enabled him to move out from the tropical areas to new places in a colder region. There is, however, considerable debate
9
8 Prehistory and Protohistory of India: A Reappraisal
■
regarding the time and place where fire came to be used first. Some scholars find its earliest evidence in the lump of a burnt clay from Chesowanga (Kenya) dated 1.4 m.y.a., while others look for it in the caves of Swartkrans (South Africa) dated 1 m.y.a. But as there is no evidence of fire place at these places, it is difficult to assert that this fire was
Read more…